Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pentium 4 optimized Crafty (& Tbird)

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 15:29:52 09/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 2001 at 16:46:23, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>Ok, I just managed to get Crafty compiled (and profiled) for the Pentium 4, I
>haven't tested it as I don't have access to a Pentium 4 but definately let me
>know how it does compared to a standard exe. I would appreciate it.  You can
>download it at:
>
>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyP4.zip
>
>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.10 (Has SMP support)
>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1810.zip
>
>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.11 (Single CPU)
>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1811.zip
>
>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.11 (Has SMP support)
>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1811-SMP.zip
>
>Again, P4 benchmarks would be appreciated. Thanks.

First off, thanks for compiling these.  As I have found Intel's compiler is MUCH
faster than Microsoft's compiler.  Even on an AMD.

Second of all.......

>
>Here's my result to compare to (Tbird 1677MHz)
>Crafty 18.10
>Total nodes: 101850052
>Raw nodes per second: 1018500
>Total elapsed time: 100
>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 6.400000

I believe that's the first time I've _EVER_ seen a single CPU machine break 1.0M
nps!!  Congrats!

Third:

Crafty v18.11 (2 cpus)
Total nodes: 110558481
Raw nodes per second: 1381981
Total elapsed time: 80
SMP time-to-ply measurement: 8.000000

This is Crafty 18.11 though, which is about 4k nps slower than 18.10 on my
machine.


Slate



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.