Author: Gregor Overney
Date: 16:07:04 09/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2001 at 18:11:42, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 26, 2001 at 17:41:22, Koundinya Veluri wrote: > >>On September 26, 2001 at 17:40:22, Koundinya Veluri wrote: >> >>>On September 26, 2001 at 16:46:23, Aaron Gordon wrote: >>> >>>>Ok, I just managed to get Crafty compiled (and profiled) for the Pentium 4, I >>>>haven't tested it as I don't have access to a Pentium 4 but definately let me >>>>know how it does compared to a standard exe. I would appreciate it. You can >>>>download it at: >>>> >>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyP4.zip >>>> >>>>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.10 (Has SMP support) >>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1810.zip >>>> >>>>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.11 (Single CPU) >>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1811.zip >>>> >>>>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.11 (Has SMP support) >>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1811-SMP.zip >>>> >>>>Again, P4 benchmarks would be appreciated. Thanks. >>>> >>>>Here's my result to compare to (Tbird 1677MHz) >>>>Crafty 18.10 >>>>Total nodes: 101850052 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 1018500 >>>>Total elapsed time: 100 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 6.400000 >>> >>>Sorry for the version differences. I hope it doesn't make a difference. >>> >>>48 MB hash, 2.5 MB pawn hash >> >>P4 1.7 Ghz, 256 MB ram >> >>> >>>Crafty 18.10 benchmark: >>> >>>Total nodes: 94500755 >>>Raw nodes per second: 665498 >>>Total elapsed time: 142 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 4.507042 >>> >>>CraftyP4 18.11 benchmark: >>> >>>Total nodes: 93487314 >>>Raw nodes per second: 687406 >>>Total elapsed time: 136 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 4.705882 >>> >>>Koundinya > >I know someone with a PIII 550mhz with Aaron's optimzed P4 Crafty, that gets a >little over 600k nps. > >No offense to you at all, but those numbers are sad. > > >Slate Not "sad" but in perfect agreement with SpecInt2000 (see www.spec.org). No surprises. A P4 is as fast as it can get when Intel tries to tweak the numbers for their crafty benchmark for SpecInt2000. A $120 Athlon 1.4 GHz outperforms a $600 P4 quite easily (around 10% difference). Is it a surprise? No. I think the architecture of the Athlon is just a little bit more suitable for real-world problems. Intel has to rethink their design for their P4 quite a bit. Crafty seems to be a good addition to SpecInt. But I guess that the "influence" of Intel might soon remove Crafty from this benchmark suite ;-) Why did Gateway stop selling Athlon? Why did Compaq abandon Alpha? It appears that those decisions are not really helping to provide better hardware for computer chess. Gregor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.