Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 16:16:15 09/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2001 at 02:17:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 25, 2001 at 19:30:10, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On September 25, 2001 at 18:15:40, john c cook wrote: >> >>> junior 7 beat chess tiger 14 10 5 5 on two 1.4 ghz Amd >>>but on my old 800mhz piii chess tiger 14 beat junior 7 8 5 3 >>>all game at 40/2hr 144 meg hash for junior 192 meg hash for chess tiger >>>on the piii i belive chess tiger 14 was the best it beat all my other prorgam >>>at 40/2hr it look to me that junior 7 on a fast computer see more but i like >>>the way chess tiger play chess has any one else come up the same way >> >>I think Gambit Tiger 2 is the program to try and beat. I think it is stronger >>than Chess Tiger 14 overall, from results, and I would be interested to see if >>you would find junior doing the the same to GT even on 1.4 Athlon hardware. >>S.Taylor > >I have played hundred of games (40/40') with ChessTiger14 and GambitTiger2 but >am still not sure which of these two programs is the stronger one. This >conclusion refers to computer matches. Against some programs CT is doing very >well and GT bad and sometimes the contrary happens. >Regards >Kurt That is easely to explain gambitTiger does not like endgames prefers more pieces on the board While Chesstiger likes endgames
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.