Author: Slater Wold
Date: 18:18:42 09/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2001 at 21:04:16, Koundinya Veluri wrote: >On September 26, 2001 at 18:11:42, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On September 26, 2001 at 17:41:22, Koundinya Veluri wrote: >> >>>On September 26, 2001 at 17:40:22, Koundinya Veluri wrote: >>> >>>>On September 26, 2001 at 16:46:23, Aaron Gordon wrote: >>>> >>>>>Ok, I just managed to get Crafty compiled (and profiled) for the Pentium 4, I >>>>>haven't tested it as I don't have access to a Pentium 4 but definately let me >>>>>know how it does compared to a standard exe. I would appreciate it. You can >>>>>download it at: >>>>> >>>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyP4.zip >>>>> >>>>>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.10 (Has SMP support) >>>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1810.zip >>>>> >>>>>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.11 (Single CPU) >>>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1811.zip >>>>> >>>>>AMD Athlon(Tbird,Duron, Palomino, etc) Optimized Crafty v18.11 (Has SMP support) >>>>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyK7-1811-SMP.zip >>>>> >>>>>Again, P4 benchmarks would be appreciated. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>>Here's my result to compare to (Tbird 1677MHz) >>>>>Crafty 18.10 >>>>>Total nodes: 101850052 >>>>>Raw nodes per second: 1018500 >>>>>Total elapsed time: 100 >>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 6.400000 >>>> >>>>Sorry for the version differences. I hope it doesn't make a difference. >>>> >>>>48 MB hash, 2.5 MB pawn hash >>> >>>P4 1.7 Ghz, 256 MB ram >>> >>>> >>>>Crafty 18.10 benchmark: >>>> >>>>Total nodes: 94500755 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 665498 >>>>Total elapsed time: 142 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 4.507042 >>>> >>>>CraftyP4 18.11 benchmark: >>>> >>>>Total nodes: 93487314 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 687406 >>>>Total elapsed time: 136 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 4.705882 >>>> >>>>Koundinya >> >>I know someone with a PIII 550mhz with Aaron's optimzed P4 Crafty, that gets a >>little over 600k nps. >> >>No offense to you at all, but those numbers are sad. >> >> >>Slate > >:) no offence taken. I didn't buy the P4 for speed... I bought it for stability. >I got it two months ago and didn't crash once, unlike my older P3 733 or the >AMD's. I hear AMD's crash a lot. I have no backup for this though because I've >never used one. I like my P4 and btw, Crafty is the slowest on it. Most other >programs get about 1.5 to 1.7x the speed from p3 733, but crafty gets about 1.1 >to 1.2x. Don't know why. > >Koundinya I've had my dual AMD for a month now, and it has crashed once. And that was a Windows bug. AMD's are pretty stable. But it's not trivial why there aren't any Quad AMD critical servers out there. :) Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.