Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 01:31:55 09/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2001 at 21:22:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I won't argue about erroneous evals. But at least they should be consistent. >Here we are talking about something that will be highly inconsistent, where we >"sniff" a fail high but then can't prove it... etc... The same applies to tactics near or at the leaves. We won't see them, and they make our evals wrong in an inconsistent way. The problem with false fail highs exists with nullmove already anyway. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.