Author: Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso
Date: 07:52:37 09/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2001 at 19:31:10, Marc van Hal wrote: >On September 25, 2001 at 18:15:40, john c cook wrote: > >> junior 7 beat chess tiger 14 10 5 5 on two 1.4 ghz Amd >>but on my old 800mhz piii chess tiger 14 beat junior 7 8 5 3 >>all game at 40/2hr 144 meg hash for junior 192 meg hash for chess tiger >>on the piii i belive chess tiger 14 was the best it beat all my other prorgam >>at 40/2hr it look to me that junior 7 on a fast computer see more but i like >>the way chess tiger play chess has any one else come up the same way > >The conclusion I make from the games I have seen so far from Junior 7 is that >Amir has used the Kasparov piece tablebase >It realy likes a knight on d3 d6 >And doesn't hasitate to sacrefice material for it > > >The passed pawns did get a higher valeu > >And the kingsafety is increased > >But sometimes it plays risky (As in risky search methode and plays at the last >second the move wich was not so good as he had in his has table for the rest of >the search (Almost human hehe) >It did find many of my anelyses quickly > >Only the Alapin defence with Nf6 Which i had anelysed is a position all >programs of today have problems with reason? >If i show the moves they don't come up with better moves then before. >Actualy with worse This is probably a stupid newbie question, but could you please explain me what is this 'Kasparov piece tablebase'? Is it some parameter set I could use im my (yet to do) chess engine? Regards, Alvaro Cardoso
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.