Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New crap statement ? Perpetuum mobile

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 15:20:39 09/27/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 2001 at 18:06:34, Olaf Jenkner wrote:

>>If you can consistently produce a speedup of 3.0, then I can time-
>>slice that same algorithm on one cpu and get a speedup of 1.5.  And I can do it
>>for _any_ alpha/beta algorithm you do in parallel.  Every time. And using your
>>code, it will be easy for me to do it.
>>
>It's a good explanation. Some people seem to believe to perpetuum mobiles.
>
>OJe


I lived in South Mississippi for 17 years, on the computer science faculty
at the university of southern mississippi.  We had a moron that lived in
Wiggins, Mississippi (about 30 miles south of Hattiesburg where USM was
located) that developed a perpetual motion machine.  He conned the press
into believing this.  But he couldn't con the US Patent Office.  And he took
them to court to force them to give him a patent.  At the trial he refused to
open his "machine" up since he had no patent yet.  The whole mess was thrown
out.  But it attracted national (negative) attention to our area.  Many still
believe that he was "screwed".  He was.  But mentally,  Not by the patent
office.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.