Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 03:54:30 09/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2001 at 06:04:48, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On September 28, 2001 at 04:43:49, Bernhard Bauer wrote: > >>On September 27, 2001 at 15:50:23, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>Not sure how much this will help but it's pretty much the same stuff as the >>>other exe's but profiled on a P3. Lemme know how it goes.. >>> >>>ftp://65.10.79.9/pub/crafty/CraftyP3.zip >> >>For the following position which is treated in another thread >> >>[D]R7/5prp/4pk2/1p2P3/5p1P/1B1n1P2/P4Pr1/5R1K b - - >> >>Bob's wcrafty gives: >> 9-> 1.05 -5.20 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd1 Nd3 3. Be2 Nxf2+ >> 4. Rxf2 Rxf2 5. Bxb5 Rgg2 6. Rh8 >> 10 1.66 -5.26 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd1 Nd3 3. Bc2 Nxf2+ >> 4. Rxf2 Rxf2 5. Be4 Rf1+ 6. Kh2 b4 >> 7. Rb8 Rf2+ 8. Kh1 Rb2 >> 10-> 1.77 -5.26 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd1 Nd3 3. Bc2 Nxf2+ >> 4. Rxf2 Rxf2 5. Be4 Rf1+ 6. Kh2 b4 >> 7. Rb8 Rf2+ 8. Kh1 Rb2 >> 11 3.11 -5.59 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd1 Nd3 3. Bc2 Nxf2+ >> 4. Rxf2 Rxf2 5. Be4 Rg3 6. Ra5 Rh3+ >> 7. Kg1 Rb2 8. Bxh7 Rxh4 >> 11-> 3.44 -5.59 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd1 Nd3 3. Bc2 Nxf2+ >> 4. Rxf2 Rxf2 5. Be4 Rg3 6. Ra5 Rh3+ >> 7. Kg1 Rb2 8. Bxh7 Rxh4 >> 12 6.98 ++ 1. ... Nxe5!! >> 12 22.19 -7.63 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 exd5 3. Ra6+ Kf5 >> 4. Ra3 b4 5. Rb3 d4 6. Rxb4 Nxf3 7. >> Rb5+ Ke4 8. Ra1 >> 12-> 22.75 -7.63 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 exd5 3. Ra6+ Kf5 >> 4. Ra3 b4 5. Rb3 d4 6. Rxb4 Nxf3 7. >> Rb5+ Ke4 8. Ra1 >> 13 34.69 ++ 1. ... Nxe5!! >> 13 2:51 -Mat07 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 R2g6 3. Bxe6 Nxf3 >> 4. Bg4 Rxg4 5. Ra6+ Kf5 6. Rh6 Rg1+ >> 7. Rxg1 Rxg1# >> 13-> 2:53 -Mat07 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 R2g6 3. Bxe6 Nxf3 >> 4. Bg4 Rxg4 5. Ra6+ Kf5 6. Rh6 Rg1+ >> 7. Rxg1 Rxg1# >> time=2:53 cpu=203% mat=0 n=98308065 fh=97% nps=568k >> ext-> chk=8750353 cap=174933 pp=225234 1rep=1464970 mate=174639 >> predicted=0 nodes=98308065 evals=1877708 >> endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 >> SMP-> split=693 stop=47 data=9/32 cpu=5:52 elap=2:53 >> >>While your CraftyP3 gives: >> >> 9-> 0.49 -5.03 1. ... Kxe5 2. Ra5 Nxf2+ 3. Rxf2 Rxf2 >> 4. Rxb5+ Kf6 5. Rb7 Rg3 6. a4 Rgxf3 >> 10 0.86 -5.42 1. ... Kxe5 2. Ra5 Nxf2+ 3. Rxf2 Rxf2 >> 4. Rxb5+ Kf6 5. Rg5 Rxg5 6. hxg5+ Kxg5 >> 7. a4 Rxf3 8. Bc4 >> (2) 10-> 1.08 -5.42 1. ... Kxe5 2. Ra5 Nxf2+ 3. Rxf2 Rxf2 >> 4. Rxb5+ Kf6 5. Rg5 Rxg5 6. hxg5+ Kxg5 >> 7. a4 Rxf3 8. Bc4 >> 11 2.22 ++ 1. ... Kxe5!! >> (2) 11-> 2.46 -5.81 1. ... Kxe5 2. Ra5 Nxf2+ 3. Rxf2 Rxf2 >> 4. Rxb5+ Kf6 5. Rg5 Rxg5 6. hxg5+ Kxg5 >> 7. a4 Rxf3 8. Bc4 >> 12 4.71 -5.78 1. ... Kxe5 2. Ra5 Nxf2+ 3. Rxf2 Rxf2 >> 4. Rxb5+ Kf6 5. Rb4 Rxf3 6. Kh2 Rf2+ >> 7. Kh1 h5 8. Rb5 e5 9. a4 >> 12 10.24 ++ 1. ... Nxe5!! >> 12 21.60 -16.17 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 R2g6 3. Bxe6 Nxf3 >> 4. Bg4 Rxg4 5. Ra6+ Ke5 6. Rg6 R4xg6 >> 7. Re1+ Nxe1 8. a3 Rg1+ 9. Kh2 R7g2+ >> 10. Kh3 Rxf2 >> 12-> 21.63 -16.17 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 R2g6 3. Bxe6 Nxf3 >> 4. Bg4 Rxg4 5. Ra6+ Ke5 6. Rg6 R4xg6 >> 7. Re1+ Nxe1 8. a3 Rg1+ 9. Kh2 R7g2+ >> 10. Kh3 Rxf2 >> 13 22.71 ++ 1. ... Nxe5!! >> 13 47.72 -Mat07 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 R2g6 3. Ra4 bxa4 >> 4. Kh2 exd5 5. Kh3 Nxf3 6. h5 Rg3+ >> 7. fxg3 Rxg3# >> 13-> 47.77 -Mat07 1. ... Nxe5 2. Bd5 R2g6 3. Ra4 bxa4 >> 4. Kh2 exd5 5. Kh3 Nxf3 6. h5 Rg3+ >> 7. fxg3 Rxg3# >> time=48.28 cpu=210% mat=0 n=25624646 fh=95% nps=530k >> ext-> chk=1967221 cap=52863 pp=91939 1rep=335874 mate=121960 >> predicted=0 nodes=25624646 evals=1688740 >> endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 >> hashing-> trans/ref=36% pawn=99% used=65% >> SMP-> split=506 stop=79 data=9/32 cpu=1:41 elap=48.28 >> >>For the bench command I get >> >> Wcrafty CraftyP3 >>95 385 463 nodes 89 453 914 >> 404 175 nps 428 009 >> 236 elapsed 209 >> 2.71186 SMP 3.0622 >> >>All on a dual P3-450. >> >>How did you compile? >> >>Kind regards >>Bernhard > >Thats cool, your scores are close to a single CPU P3-800 box. Friend of mine >benchmarked his P3-800 and got.. > >Total nodes: 104161030 >Raw nodes per second: 493654 >Total elapsed time: 211 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 3.033175 > >I just compiled with... >CFLAGS = -O2 -Qipo -G6 -Qunroll -Qprof_gen -Qprof_dir c:\opt > >Then ran the program for a while & benchmarked it on a P3 then recompiled with.. >CFLAGS = -O2 -Qipo -G6 -Qunroll -Qprof_use -Qprof_dir c:\opt > >I've been trying new compiler flags but so far this seems to be fastest (for >me).. I'll post new exe's if I find something faster. As MS C-compiler doesn't have a Q option I suppose you use the Intel compiler. I only have the MS compiler. Thanks Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.