Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:05:54 09/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2001 at 12:55:04, Uri Blass wrote: >New position >[D]rnb2r1k/pp1p2pp/2p1P3/4p3/1qB3Q1/2N4P/P1P3P1/1RB4K b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Crafty 18.10: > >2...Qxc3 3.exd7 Nxd7 > -+ (-8.27) Depth: 1/11 00:00:00 >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Qe1+ 4.Kh2 > -+ (-6.88) Depth: 2/11 00:00:00 >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bg5 Qxc2 > -+ (-7.11) Depth: 3/11 00:00:00 >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bg5 Qxc2 > -+ (-7.11) Depth: 4/13 00:00:00 >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Qe1+ 4.Kh2 Re8 5.Qg5 d5 > -+ (-7.24) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bg5 Qxc2 5.Rf1 d5 > -+ (-7.32) Depth: 6/17 00:00:00 97kN >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bb2 Qb4 5.Qxg7+ Kxg7 6.Bxe5+ Kg6 7.Rxb4 Rxe7 > -+ (-6.81) Depth: 7/19 00:00:01 257kN >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bb2 Qb4 5.Qxg7+ Kxg7 6.Bxe5+ Kg6 7.Rxb4 Rxe7 8.Bd3+ Kg5 > -+ (-6.81) Depth: 8/20 00:00:01 526kN >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bb2 Qb4 5.Qxg7+ Kxg7 6.Bxe5+ Kh6 7.Rxb4 Rxe7 8.Bf4+ Kg6 >9.Kh2 > -+ (-6.69) Depth: 9/23 00:00:03 1186kN >2...Qxc3 3.Bb2 Qxc2 4.e7 Qxb1+ 5.Kh2 Re8 6.Qf3 h6 7.Qf8+ Rxf8 8.exf8Q+ Kh7 >9.Qg8+ Kg6 10.Bxe5 Qf5 11.Qxg7+ > -+ (-6.57) Depth: 10/25 00:00:09 3703kN >2...Qxc3 3.e7 Re8 4.Bh6 gxh6 5.Rf1 Qa3 6.Rf7 Qc1+ 7.Bf1 Qg5 8.Rf8+ Kg7 9.Qxg5+ >hxg5 10.Rxe8 Kf6 11.Rxc8 Kxe7 > -+ (-4.16) Depth: 11/25 00:14:53 541954kN > >(Blass, Tel-aviv 28.09.2001) > >Uri That is *obviously* wrong. If Qxc3, it's an easy win for white. Most programs I tested could see that. I however did not test Crafty. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.