Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 23:11:45 09/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2001 at 22:43:39, Slater Wold wrote: >On September 28, 2001 at 22:31:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On September 28, 2001 at 22:22:53, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On September 28, 2001 at 17:54:39, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>Probably I don't understand something, but on SpecInt 2k P4 is *overall* better >>>>than Athlon. >>> >>>That might just have something to do with the fact that Intel >>>has a SPECialized compiler for those kind of benchmarks. >> >>Ah, you were talking about GCC. Sorry. >> >>Haven't checked those numbers, but the ones I am looking at are quite clear. >> >>1.4Ghz Athlon: 554 peak >>1.4Ghz P4 : 512 peak >> >>The 1.5Ghz P4 is also slower. The 1.7Ghz is the first to catch up. >> >>P4 faster at same clock speed? Naah. >> >>-- >>GCP > >I guess it's kinda like cars. I once had a 1991 Ford Mustang with a 302ci motor >in it. All I heard from the Camaro and Trans Am drivers, was how slow the >Mustangs were. Wellll.......their Camaro's and Trans Am's had 350ci motors in >them!! > >After owning the Mustang for about a year, I put a Ford 351W motor in it, which >is a 351ci motor. Just to keep up with the "Jones". > >You know not a single person wanted to race, or find out which 350ci motor was >faster........ > >I wonder why? > >If you're going to compare something, make sure it's an apple to an apple, or an >orange to an orange. :) > > > >Slate Slate knowing your need for speed, it probably won't be long before you get a dual engine in your car too :) Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.