Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: a strange positional evaluation

Author: allan johnson

Date: 18:05:58 09/29/01

Go up one level in this thread

On September 29, 2001 at 18:02:31, Uri Blass wrote:

>PATZER 3.61 - Quark
>[D]8/6kB/8/6P1/P7/4p3/3bK3/8 w - - 0 1
>
>I wonder what is the reason that patzer evaluated
>this drawn position as +2.50 for white.
>
>Even programs with only material evaluation can see only +1
>for white.
>
>What is the reason for 1.5 pawns positional bonus?
>
>Uri
 Uri: Perhaps the programmer did not include rules about end games when the
bishops are on opposite colours?
Al

• Re: a strange positional evaluation Uri Blass 01:27:44 09/30/01
  • Re: a strange positional evaluation Simon Finn 06:49:15 09/30/01
    • Re: a strange positional evaluation Simon Finn 11:09:37 09/30/01
      • Re: a strange positional evaluation Simon Finn 19:14:43 09/30/01
        • Re: a strange positional evaluation Dieter Buerssner 12:14:22 10/01/01
          • Re: a strange positional evaluation Simon Finn 16:49:54 10/01/01
            • Re: a strange positional evaluation Simon Finn 02:09:28 10/02/01
              • Re: a strange positional evaluation (corrected diagram) Simon Finn 02:12:43 10/02/01
                • Re: Thanks (a strange positional evaluation (corrected diagram) ) Dieter Buerssner 09:23:22 10/02/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.