Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:27:44 09/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2001 at 21:05:58, allan johnson wrote: >On September 29, 2001 at 18:02:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>PATZER 3.61 - Quark >>[D]8/6kB/8/6P1/P7/4p3/3bK3/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>I wonder what is the reason that patzer evaluated >>this drawn position as +2.50 for white. >> >>Even programs with only material evaluation can see only +1 >>for white. >> >>What is the reason for 1.5 pawns positional bonus? >> >>Uri > Uri: Perhaps the programmer did not include rules about end games when the >bishops are on opposite colours? >Al even without rules for opposite bishop the question still remain What is the reason for 1.5 pawns positional bonus. I do not think that a dustance passed pawn justifies 1.5 pawn positional bonus. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.