Author: Slater Wold
Date: 11:34:23 09/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 2001 at 11:42:28, Joshua Lee wrote: >On September 29, 2001 at 15:34:45, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On September 29, 2001 at 14:42:02, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>Sue me if i am wrong but you don't get 2X with Dual Systems more like 1.7x and >>>sometimes less sometimes more when in comes to chess so 2380Mhz sounds more >>>correct. >> >>I won't sue you. :) >> >>But you are correct. Some get 1.9x (Crafty) and some get 1.3x (Deep Fritz). >> >>I think it's a little more than 2380mhz though. Perhaps 2600mhz. Which is >>still faster than 1600mhz. >> >>Not to mention, I can get a full 1400mhz out of 2 applications, while he can >>only get 1600mhz out of 1 application. >> >> >>Slate > >How do applications like SETI , Distributed net, etc run with the duals? > >I have tried SETI with my now anchient 800Mhz athlon and it takes upto 2 days >for a seti block to finish. If Cancerbusters works with Dual processor systems >that would be great too. I know for a fact that their are distributed programs that are SMP. Not sure if any of these are. I used to have the cancer screensaver back when I had my 2x1000mhz. And it used 200% of the CPU's. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.