Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position:

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 12:18:44 10/01/01

Go up one level in this thread

To be fair, this is because it thought g4 was also a draw.  If Yace thought
that, too, there isn't a difference.

I'm not trying to apologize for Crafty, but it is dangerous to assume that just
because one program chose the fork in the road that did not lead to an army of
demons, it means that it could see them.

Maybe it saw them, I don't know.

bruce

• Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dann Corbit 12:30:41 10/01/01
  • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Bruce Moreland 18:20:08 10/01/01
    • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Peter McKenzie 20:20:06 10/01/01
    • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dann Corbit 18:39:41 10/01/01
      • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dann Corbit 18:45:44 10/01/01
        • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dave Gomboc 22:36:28 10/01/01
          • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Uri Blass 22:43:27 10/01/01
            • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Gian-Carlo Pascutto 00:33:42 10/02/01
              • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Bruce Moreland 01:45:20 10/02/01
              • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Uri Blass 01:14:00 10/02/01
  • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: [with picture] Dann Corbit 12:34:02 10/01/01
    • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: [with picture] Tim Foden 04:19:16 10/03/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.