Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position:

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 12:30:41 10/01/01

Go up one level in this thread

On October 01, 2001 at 15:18:44, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>To be fair, this is because it thought g4 was also a draw.  If Yace thought
>that, too, there isn't a difference.
>
>I'm not trying to apologize for Crafty, but it is dangerous to assume that just
>because one program chose the fork in the road that did not lead to an army of
>demons, it means that it could see them.
>
>Maybe it saw them, I don't know.

Of course, every good program will shine on some position and not do as well on
others.

How does Ferret do on this one?  The machine I used was 950 MHz Athlon for
comparison.

• Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Bruce Moreland 18:20:08 10/01/01
  • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Peter McKenzie 20:20:06 10/01/01
  • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dann Corbit 18:39:41 10/01/01
    • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dann Corbit 18:45:44 10/01/01
      • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Dave Gomboc 22:36:28 10/01/01
        • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Uri Blass 22:43:27 10/01/01
          • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Gian-Carlo Pascutto 00:33:42 10/02/01
            • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Bruce Moreland 01:45:20 10/02/01
            • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: Uri Blass 01:14:00 10/02/01
• Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: [with picture] Dann Corbit 12:34:02 10/01/01
  • Re: JAFM's interesting pawn endgame test position: [with picture] Tim Foden 04:19:16 10/03/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.