Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:38:55 10/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2001 at 17:41:59, Roy Eassa wrote: >On October 01, 2001 at 15:48:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>My counting positions program found that >>3.7010630121207222927827147741452119115968e46 is an upper bound when I >>considered only the squares of the pieces and did not consider side to move,en >>passant rule and rights to castle. > > >Would it be reasonable to round this off to 3.7e46? Or are all the extra digits >really important? It is reasonable to call it 3.7e46 Remember that it is only an upper bound and a lot of illegal positions are also included in this number and the position that dann corbit posted is only one example Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.