Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 18:45:44 10/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2001 at 21:39:41, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 01, 2001 at 21:20:08, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On October 01, 2001 at 15:30:41, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On October 01, 2001 at 15:18:44, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>To be fair, this is because it thought g4 was also a draw. If Yace thought >>>>that, too, there isn't a difference. >>>> >>>>I'm not trying to apologize for Crafty, but it is dangerous to assume that just >>>>because one program chose the fork in the road that did not lead to an army of >>>>demons, it means that it could see them. >>>> >>>>Maybe it saw them, I don't know. >>> >>>Of course, every good program will shine on some position and not do as well on >>>others. >>> >>>How does Ferret do on this one? The machine I used was 950 MHz Athlon for >>>comparison. >> >>It took 35 seconds on a dual 1.2 ghz machine, with tables (but not KPP vs KP). >>The score was 0.00. Without tables it's been going for a while and hasn't found >>it yet. I am curious about why you don't have kppkp. It's only 50 megabytes: 05/10/2000 12:00a 34,118,774 kppkp.nbb.emd 05/10/2000 12:00a 28,762,929 kppkp.nbw.emd >I have the full 5 piece Nalimov files on my machine, and all of my chess >programs point to the same set. > >For the Edwards, I only have the 4 piece set. > >It looks like an excellent test position.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.