Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 20:20:06 10/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2001 at 21:20:08, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On October 01, 2001 at 15:30:41, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On October 01, 2001 at 15:18:44, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>To be fair, this is because it thought g4 was also a draw. If Yace thought >>>that, too, there isn't a difference. >>> >>>I'm not trying to apologize for Crafty, but it is dangerous to assume that just >>>because one program chose the fork in the road that did not lead to an army of >>>demons, it means that it could see them. >>> >>>Maybe it saw them, I don't know. >> >>Of course, every good program will shine on some position and not do as well on >>others. >> >>How does Ferret do on this one? The machine I used was 950 MHz Athlon for >>comparison. > >It took 35 seconds on a dual 1.2 ghz machine, with tables (but not KPP vs KP). >The score was 0.00. Without tables it's been going for a while and hasn't found >it yet. Mine doesn't have tables and found it in 250sec (1ghz PIII). Didn't have a draw score but not far off, and it held it for several iterations. Nice position, will add it to my endgame test suite. cheers, Peter > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.