Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 22:36:28 10/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 01, 2001 at 21:45:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 01, 2001 at 21:39:41, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On October 01, 2001 at 21:20:08, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On October 01, 2001 at 15:30:41, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On October 01, 2001 at 15:18:44, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>To be fair, this is because it thought g4 was also a draw. If Yace thought >>>>>that, too, there isn't a difference. >>>>> >>>>>I'm not trying to apologize for Crafty, but it is dangerous to assume that just >>>>>because one program chose the fork in the road that did not lead to an army of >>>>>demons, it means that it could see them. >>>>> >>>>>Maybe it saw them, I don't know. >>>> >>>>Of course, every good program will shine on some position and not do as well on >>>>others. >>>> >>>>How does Ferret do on this one? The machine I used was 950 MHz Athlon for >>>>comparison. >>> >>>It took 35 seconds on a dual 1.2 ghz machine, with tables (but not KPP vs KP). >>>The score was 0.00. Without tables it's been going for a while and hasn't found >>>it yet. > >I am curious about why you don't have kppkp. It's only 50 megabytes: >05/10/2000 12:00a 34,118,774 kppkp.nbb.emd >05/10/2000 12:00a 28,762,929 kppkp.nbw.emd AFAIK Bruce uses his own code for tablebases. Perhaps he didn't generate KPPKP due to en passant issues. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.