Author: Slater Wold
Date: 06:06:14 10/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2001 at 04:30:43, Adam Oellermann wrote: >On October 02, 2001 at 14:56:25, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On October 02, 2001 at 01:17:27, Eran wrote: >> >>>On October 02, 2001 at 00:27:30, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On October 01, 2001 at 21:33:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>[snip] >>>>>>If it will do in the future, it will be a solid chess computer, right? ;-) >>>>> >>>>>Solid, spherical, multi-layer whatever. >>>>>You aren't going to get electrons or photons to move faster than light. >>>>> >>>>>Look at the MHz you imply with the above figure and then calculate the trace >>>>>size that would be needed to prevent breaking the speed of light. >>>>> >>>>>9cm of wire takes a full nanosecond to transverse. >>>>> >>>>>I'm not saying it is impossible. Just that it is not possible with any physical >>>>>process we know of now. >>>> >>>>Put simply: NOT IN OUR LIFETIME. >>>> >>>> >>>>:) >>>> >>>> >>>>Slate >>> >>>I hope to see, feel and play it even once before I die. What a pity if I will >>>never do it. Heck, y'know that life is not fair. Next generation of our children >>>and grandchildren will be luckier than we are today! They could buy very >>>powerful heldhand computer chess (around 4000 Elo Rating!) containing atomic >>>chips or "superstring" chips or whatever for $1.99 to $5.99 at CVS stores in the >>>year 2100!!. What a bright future for them &%$#@%*!@%($%@@W%^#$ How lucky they >>>will be; I am beginning to envy them really :-((( >>> >>>Eran >> >>I'm not sure about you. But I plan to be alive in 2100. :) >> > >I hope to be alive, but I don't particularly expect to be at the top of my game >chesswise... > >- Ada, LOL! Perhaps we should be working on a "Viagra" for chess then?? Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.