Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pawn ending ==> Taimanov-Zakharov,USSR 1969

Author: Simon Finn

Date: 08:03:24 10/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 04, 2001 at 11:01:15, Simon Finn wrote:

>On October 04, 2001 at 09:59:03, Simon Finn wrote:
>
>>On October 04, 2001 at 02:16:42, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>On October 03, 2001 at 19:49:56, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 03, 2001 at 15:45:32, José Antônio Fabiano Mendes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>      Taimanov-Zakharov,USSR 1969 === Black to move and win
>>>>>      [D]8/5p2/7p/5pk1/8/5KPP/8/8 b
>>>>>      Source:  http://chesscafe.com/text/secpawnendings.txt
>>>>
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>I also get 1..h5 with a +2.4 score so I really wonder if 1..Kf6 is the
>>>move to win.
>>
>>1...h5! is definitely best.
>>
>>Karsten & Mueller's 1...Kg6 2. Ke3 Kg7 is less convincing, since
>>
>>3. Kf3! h5 (3... Kh7 4. Kf4 Kg6 5. Ke3 etc) 4. Ke3 Kh6 5. Kf3 Kg5 6 h4+
>>
>>is just a long-winded way to reach the main line after 1...h5!
>>
>>Instead, after 1...Kf6 2. Kf4 Ke6 3. Ke3 Ke5 4. Kf3
>>
>>[D]8/5p2/7p/4kp2/8/5KPP/8/8 b
>>
>>we get an even harder (6 ply deeper) test position.
>>
>>Black can win only by retracing his steps:
>>
>>4...Kf6 5. Kf4 Kg6 6. Ke3 Kg5 7. Kf3 h5! etc
>>
>>because
>>
>>4...f6? 5. g4 =
>>
>>4...f4? 5. gxf4+ Kd5 (5...Kf5 6. Ke3) 6. Kg4 Ke4 7. Kh5 Kxf4 8. Kxh6 =
>>
>>4...h5 5. Ke3 f4+? (5...Kf6! 6. Kf4 Kg6 7. Kf3 Kg5 -+) 6. gxf4+ Kd5 7. Kd3! f6
>>8. Ke3 f5 (8...Kc4 9. Ke4) 9. Kd3 h4 10. Ke3 Kc4 11. Kf3 Kd4 12. Kf2 Ke4 13. Ke2
>>Kxf4 14. Kf2 Ke4 15. Ke2 f4 16. Kf2 f3 17. Kf1 Ke3 18. Ke1 Kf4 19. Kf2 =
>
>Whoops! 17... Kf5 18. Ke1 Ke5 19. Kf1 Kf4 -+

I meant 19... Ke4 -+. Not my day for accuracy!

Simon

>
>>
>>That's why 1...h5 is best - Black can't win unless he forces White to advance
>>his h-pawn.
>>
>>>
>>>Ed
>>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>>00:04:21 31.00  2.36   1..h5 2.h4+ Kg6 3.Ke3 Kg7 4.Kf3
>>>                       f6 5.Kf4 Kg6 6.Ke3 Kf7 7.Kf3 Kg7
>>>                       8.Kf4 Kg6 9.Ke3 Kf7 10.Kf3  (203)
>>
>>The score is convincing but the PV isn't. What causes the repetition?
>>
>>Simon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.