Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 08:23:27 10/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2001 at 07:25:50, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On October 04, 2001 at 05:01:55, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On October 03, 2001 at 16:55:59, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>Whatabout all anelyses I posted the last years >>>Talking about valuable info lost >>>Later on you may pay big money to someone else for the same thing. >>>Only many important info is left out. >>>Or in other cases they did not look at updates I had made . >> >>I'm soon going to give up and leave this forum anyway. It's too much for me too. >> I posted a long reply to one of the "hidden" posts, and mine seems to have >>become hidden too. All that work for nothing, and I'm not a good typist. >> >> But not only that, but I write so many things with great energy and things of >>great interest, I think, and the more interesting and deep they are, the less >>response there is, and 90% or more gets no response, and I keep checking and >>checking for no reason. >> I don't even think there are enough people on this forum to warrant deep >>interesting matters, as out of the people here,there are not even 5 that are >>interested or would bother to follow every legitimate and interesting thread. >> One thinks one is putting ones questions or thoughts or contributions before a >>large public of big experts etc, or interested people, when in fact maybe only >>one or two might click into it and read the first few words and then click >>further, and possibly not even one person even reads it all. So no one even >>knows what I wrote. >>S.Taylor > >I read almost all the postings here every day, but most of them i am not >qualified to reply to, i have only been an active member 1 year or so. 2 years >ago i did not even know how to install a program on my then P133 mhz 16 MB >computer. Some posts however interesting they might be by default, have no >interest to me, in the sense that i don't fully understand them or find them >truly uninteresting :). >Currently i am mostly interested in commercial engines and their respective >srength, style etc. and i use this forum as a source for that purpose, if there >is some topics that i can contibute on/with i happily do so and my biggest wish >is to someday program my own engine, thus i went out and bought Borland c++ >builder 5.0 in the hope that it would be easy LOL (keep i in mind my knowledge >of computers 2 years ago) i know now that it is a really hard task and that i >have to gradually get aquainted with everything compchess has to offer in terms >of knowledge, and with that in mind i would like to point out that i have come a >long way just from reading posts here and getting in to the "right" frame of >mind in order to achieve my goal, even though i only reply to 10% of the posts i >read, i learn from most of those i read. > >Regards >Jonas The strenght of programs also depends on who is using them in some cases I am prety sure for instance my Junior 7 is a lot stronger then the one's used only for computer computer games
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.