Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 09:13:23 10/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2001 at 11:23:27, Marc van Hal wrote: >On October 04, 2001 at 07:25:50, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On October 04, 2001 at 05:01:55, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On October 03, 2001 at 16:55:59, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>Whatabout all anelyses I posted the last years >>>>Talking about valuable info lost >>>>Later on you may pay big money to someone else for the same thing. >>>>Only many important info is left out. >>>>Or in other cases they did not look at updates I had made . >>> >>>I'm soon going to give up and leave this forum anyway. It's too much for me too. >>> I posted a long reply to one of the "hidden" posts, and mine seems to have >>>become hidden too. All that work for nothing, and I'm not a good typist. >>> >>> But not only that, but I write so many things with great energy and things of >>>great interest, I think, and the more interesting and deep they are, the less >>>response there is, and 90% or more gets no response, and I keep checking and >>>checking for no reason. >>> I don't even think there are enough people on this forum to warrant deep >>>interesting matters, as out of the people here,there are not even 5 that are >>>interested or would bother to follow every legitimate and interesting thread. >>> One thinks one is putting ones questions or thoughts or contributions before a >>>large public of big experts etc, or interested people, when in fact maybe only >>>one or two might click into it and read the first few words and then click >>>further, and possibly not even one person even reads it all. So no one even >>>knows what I wrote. >>>S.Taylor >> >>I read almost all the postings here every day, but most of them i am not >>qualified to reply to, i have only been an active member 1 year or so. 2 years >>ago i did not even know how to install a program on my then P133 mhz 16 MB >>computer. Some posts however interesting they might be by default, have no >>interest to me, in the sense that i don't fully understand them or find them >>truly uninteresting :). >>Currently i am mostly interested in commercial engines and their respective >>srength, style etc. and i use this forum as a source for that purpose, if there >>is some topics that i can contibute on/with i happily do so and my biggest wish >>is to someday program my own engine, thus i went out and bought Borland c++ >>builder 5.0 in the hope that it would be easy LOL (keep i in mind my knowledge >>of computers 2 years ago) i know now that it is a really hard task and that i >>have to gradually get aquainted with everything compchess has to offer in terms >>of knowledge, and with that in mind i would like to point out that i have come a >>long way just from reading posts here and getting in to the "right" frame of >>mind in order to achieve my goal, even though i only reply to 10% of the posts i >>read, i learn from most of those i read. >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >The strenght of programs also depends on who is using them in some cases >I am prety sure for instance my Junior 7 is a lot stronger then the one's used >only for computer computer games Well the actual strenght of your Junior 7 is exactly the same as the one's used in comp v comp games, given that it is the same version of course, but what you can do with a good book suited for the style of a particular engine and other various tweaking and tunings, is another keddle of fish, but other than that i don't see how your/my Junior x can be stronger than any other Junior x, Fritz x etc. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.