Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:19:36 10/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2001 at 15:15:36, Roy Eassa wrote: >> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2001-10-02 81185 games played by 226 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2726 55 -51 182 65% 2618 >> 2 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2720 50 -48 205 59% 2653 >> 3 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2703 49 -46 230 65% 2592 >> 4 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 2699 50 -47 222 67% 2577 >> 5 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2679 61 -59 140 59% 2615 >> 6 Deep Fritz 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2654 27 -26 731 63% 2560 >> 7 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2653 68 -63 119 61% 2574 >> 8 Gambit Tiger 2.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2640 30 -29 592 66% 2521 >> 9 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2632 32 -30 537 66% 2518 >> 10 Junior 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2624 45 -42 271 65% 2518 >> 11 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2623 23 -23 968 64% 2521 >> 12 Shredder 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2601 24 -23 928 63% 2509 >> 13 Shredder 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2600 36 -34 409 61% 2517 > > >Interesting that on the faster PC, Shredder 5.32 outrates Junior 7 by 20 points, >whereas on the slower hardware Junior 7 outrates Shredder 5.32 by 24 points. (I >tend to believe the latter more.) Makes perfect sense to me. On the WMCCC contests, Shredder always gets the hottest hardware available, and smokes the competition. In other words, good chance that the algorithm is slightly superior, so that as speed increases O(f(n)) takes over.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.