Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New crap statement ? Perpetuum mobile

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 14:37:43 10/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 04, 2001 at 15:45:25, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On October 04, 2001 at 14:44:56, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>There is really nothing else to say.  I point out the flaw in the first case,
>>and Bruce offers the second case.  I do the math for all the cases including
>>the one he offered, he said "but you should only consider the second case."
>>I then say OK, I will compare one element from each half of the list, and
>>proceed that way, which cancels the super-linear speedup" and he responds "but
>>that would be slower in the normal case.  (which his super-linear example does
>>not consider, btw).
>>
>>
>>This is going round and round...
>
>lol
>
>They keep comming to your office with new perpetuum mobile machines, throwing
>the sketches on your table and eagerly claiming: "this one will work".
>
>hang in there Bob,
>Sune


The problem is that my office is of finite size.  And the perpetual motion
machines are about to crowd me out into the hallway.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.