Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New crap statement ? Perpetuum mobile

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 15:18:37 10/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 04, 2001 at 18:08:31, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>No, that is the point.  If your parallel algorithm consistently super-linearly
>outperforms your sequential algorithm, then your sequential algorithm is proven
>to be bad, and you should fix it.

"Bad" lies on a contiuum, and applies to everything in that sense.

bruce




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.