Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 18:54:49 10/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2001 at 21:43:54, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>On October 03, 2001 at 18:35:55, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On October 03, 2001 at 17:38:24, Theo van der Storm wrote:
>>
>>>Compact table (final results)
>>>
>>> # Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score BU
>>> 1 Gambit Tiger 14.6 6w1 4b1 2w1 3b0 5w= 7w1 8b= 5.0 28.0
>>> 2 Rebel Maastricht 3b= 10w1 1b0 7w1 4b1 6w= 9b1 5.0 23.0
>>> 3 YACE 0.99.56 2w= 7b= 5b= 1w1 8b1 9w1 4b0 4.5 26.0
>>> 4 Zarkov 4.5T 8b1 1w0 7b= 9w1 2w0 10b1 3w1 4.5 22.0
>>> 5 PATZER 3.61 7w= 9b= 3w= 6b= 1b= 8w1 10w1 4.5 21.0
>>> 6 Bringer 1.9 beta 1b0 8w= 10b1 5w= 9b1 2b= 7w= 4.0 22.0
>>> 7 Quark v1.60 Berlin 5b= 3w= 4w= 2b0 10w1 1b0 6b= 3.0 28.0
>>> 8 IsiChess X 4w0 6b= 9w= 10b1 3w0 5b0 1w= 2.5 24.5
>>> 9 Neurologic 10b= 5w= 8b= 4b0 6w0 3b0 2w0 1.5 25.5
>>> 10 Lokal-Matador 9w= 2b0 6w0 8w0 7b0 4w0 5b0 0.5 25.0
>>>
>>>
>>> # Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Score BU SB G
>>> 1 Gambit Tiger 14.6 X 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 ½ . . 5.0 28.0 20.00 7
>>> 2 Rebel Maastricht 0 X ½ 1 . ½ 1 . 1 1 5.0 23.0 13.75 7
>>> 3 YACE 0.99.56 1 ½ X 0 ½ . ½ 1 1 . 4.5 26.0 15.25 7
>>> 4 Zarkov 4.5T 0 0 1 X . . ½ 1 1 1 4.5 22.0 10.50 7
>>> 5 PATZER 3.61 ½ . ½ . X ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 4.5 21.0 12.00 7
>>> 6 Bringer 1.9 beta 0 ½ . . ½ X ½ ½ 1 1 4.0 22.0 9.50 7
>>> 7 Quark v1.60 Berlin 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ X . . 1 3.0 28.0 9.25 7
>>> 8 IsiChess X ½ . 0 0 0 ½ . X ½ 1 2.5 24.5 5.75 7
>>> 9 Neurologic . 0 0 0 ½ 0 . ½ X ½ 1.5 25.5 3.75 7
>>> 10 Lokal-Matador . 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 ½ X 0.5 25.0 0.75 7
>>>
>>>Congratulations to Christophe, Ed and Dieter!
>>>
>>>Greetings from Amsterdam,
>>>Theo van der Storm
>>
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>Hello Christophe,
>
>Congratulations from Berlin!
>
>I operated Gambit Tiger 14.6 in all games except the second round, and I was
>very impressed by the engine: in the middle game it outsearched its opponents
>most of the time by 1, 2 or even 3 plies! The effective branching factor
>consistently appeared to be not more than 2! Wow!
>
>Obviously some sort of forward pruning is involved... but that is pure
>speculation, of course. Any comments? :-)
Yes, Tiger has always been what I call an "hyperselective" program.
It prunes forward and backward, like a beast! :)
>The loss against YaCE in round 4 looks like a book problem to me. The first
>move out of book (8...O-O) had evaluation -0.48, and did not improve for
>quite some time.
>
>Still, a great performance!
Thanks!
And thanks for operating the program! I do not know where Tiger would be without
people like you, because as you know I live too far away to participate in any
tournament...
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.