Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 11:49:07 05/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 1998 at 12:09:57, Thorsten Czub wrote: Fritz has played against stronger opposition than any other program on the current SSDF list (February 1998). Average opponent SSDF-ELO rating was 2463 and Fritz cannot play against the strongest program on that list - itself - which increases the SSDF-ELO average of all those programs that have played against Fritz. All other P200MMX programs on the SSDF list have also played against opponents on weaker hardware. So exactly the opposite of what Thorsten hinted at is true. After having been asked here a few days ago if it would be advisable to return Fritz because of its weak playing strength, I see that the anti-Fritz campaign has already reached some of its goals. Considering this, I find the below allegations irresponsible and most disreputable. Go figure ... >Although nimzo98 is on the market for a while, >they still test nimzo 3.5 (the very weak predecessor) against >Fritz5. And they put Nimzo3.5 on a p90. I guess with 16 MB ? Or 8MB?? >And this the 21st april !! > >ok - I guess Fritz5 's playing strength will not decrease that early !!! > > >If they HELP this way, it will never come to a realistic level !! > >Heavens.... >What do they want to measure ? That a p90 and nimzo3.5 plays weaker than >fritz5 on 200 Mhz MMX with 64MB and 525 MB powerbook? > >Thanks :-)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.