Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 13:43:41 05/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 1998 at 15:10:33, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On May 24, 1998 at 14:49:07, Moritz Berger wrote: >>All other P200MMX programs on the SSDF list have also played against >>opponents on weaker hardware. > >But for no other program speed difference is so important as for fritz ! >I would advise them to try to put FRITZ on the p90, with 16 MB HASH >please and let it play vs. Hiarcs and Comet. >This would be fair. >But of course they don't do this, since they have decided to test FRITZ >ONLY on 200 Mhz machines with at least 64 MB and best with powerbooks. > > >ALL OTHER programs have been tested on p90 vs. 200 Mhz machines. >ONLY fritz - as the first program who gets a MINIMAL hardware - >is not slowed down on those machines. NOT TRUE (again): Nimzo 98, Shredder 2, M-Chess 7.1 have also not appeared on P90 at the SSDF. > >>So exactly the opposite of what Thorsten hinted at is true. > >I can only see that the opposite of YOUR statements IS true. >ALL OTHERS are transformed = slowed down on p90's meanwhile FRITZ5 as an >exception gets at least 200 Mhz MMX and 64 MB and powerbooks. Nimzo, Shredder, Rebel, Hiarcs, Genius are rated on P200MMX, comparable to the rating for Fritz on P200MMX one should presume ... >THIS is what I call betraying about facts. >Thanks Moritz. > >>After having been asked here a few days ago if it would be advisable to >>return Fritz because of its weak playing strength, I see that the >>anti-Fritz campaign has already reached some of its goals. Considering >>this, I find the below allegations irresponsible and most disreputable. > > >Was unverantwortlich ist kann ich dir sagen. Hier so zu tun als ob das >eine normale Prozedur war die da mit Fritz5 ablief. >De Facto werden alle anderen auf langsamen Kisten "getestet" (was auch >immer ein solch sinnloses TESTEN bewirken soll) waehrend Fritz in den >Genuss einer schnellen, aufgepeppten Hardware kommt. Und ihr kommentiert >das auch noch bloed mit: ich weiss gar nicht was das soll, das war doch >immer so ! >Und merkt gar nicht, dass ihr damit euren eigenen Standpunkt WIDERLEGT: >naemlich gerade WEIL das immer so war und scheinbar immer noch so ist, >gerade deswegen, ist es eben unfair, weil Fritz NICHT auf p90 gegen >einen aufgepeppten Rebel oder Hiarcs zu spielen hat, sondern at least >einen >200 Mhz MMX mit 64 MB gestellt bekommt. Again: All (100%, all of them) the latest Windows programs are tested only on P200MMX, not on P90. Fritz is absolutely no exception here. >Wenn eine Ausnahme im Umkehrschluss der Begruendung mit der generellen >Ungerechtigkeit getarnt wird, die ja auf die Ausnahme ueberhaupt nicht >zutrifft, nenne ich das eine dummdreiste Luege oder schlicht, nichtmals >die erkennung rudimentaerer logik-kenntnisse. > >Danke fuer dein output, da es wirklich selbstentlarvend war. > > >> >>Go figure ... >> > > >Figure mal selbst !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.