Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 11:21:30 10/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2001 at 10:30:27, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 07, 2001 at 10:19:37, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On October 07, 2001 at 08:10:15, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>Also, you can't get anywhere by playing against the SAME program but at >>>different speeds. The slower one will NEVER win, because the one on fast speed >>>knows everything that the one on Palm knows, and at a fraction of the time. >>> But you MIGHT be a bit luckier if you played Palm Tiger vs. Deep Fritz, or >>>Deep Junior. >>>S.Taylor >> >> >>A fair match could only be accomplished by pairing Chess Tiger on a Palm III xe >>16 MHz with 8 MB memory Versus Fritz 6e on a Pentium 90 MHz. Now that could be >>an interesting match. A match of 30 games at 20 Min per side. >> >>Pichard. > >palm tiger has no chance against p90 > >I remember that the pocket PC is 10 times faster than the palm >The pocket PC is slower than p90 so p90 is more than 10 times faster than the >palm. > >Uri You are right Uri a P90 is too powerful for a mere Palm III xe, in that case if somebody has an old Pentium 200 MHz with Fritz 6e and match it against an iPaq of 206 MHz with Chess Tiger 14.6, then we will have an even match. In the previous Comparison only a Palm M505 of 33 MHz could compete against an old 386 P.C. of 33 MHz. http://computers.cnet.com/hardware/0-2709830-404-5611782.html?tag=rev Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.