Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:41:15 10/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2001 at 14:21:30, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 07, 2001 at 10:30:27, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 07, 2001 at 10:19:37, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On October 07, 2001 at 08:10:15, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>Also, you can't get anywhere by playing against the SAME program but at >>>>different speeds. The slower one will NEVER win, because the one on fast speed >>>>knows everything that the one on Palm knows, and at a fraction of the time. >>>> But you MIGHT be a bit luckier if you played Palm Tiger vs. Deep Fritz, or >>>>Deep Junior. >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>> >>>A fair match could only be accomplished by pairing Chess Tiger on a Palm III xe >>>16 MHz with 8 MB memory Versus Fritz 6e on a Pentium 90 MHz. Now that could be >>>an interesting match. A match of 30 games at 20 Min per side. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>palm tiger has no chance against p90 >> >>I remember that the pocket PC is 10 times faster than the palm >>The pocket PC is slower than p90 so p90 is more than 10 times faster than the >>palm. >> >>Uri > > >You are right Uri a P90 is too powerful for a mere Palm III xe, in that case if >somebody has an old Pentium 200 MHz with Fritz 6e and match it against an iPaq >of 206 MHz with Chess Tiger 14.6, then we will have an even match. No Even here is is not a fair match and the MHZ is misleading. I compared the speed of my p200MMX(shredder5.32) with the speed of shredder on the pocket PC (pocket Fritz is the name of shredder on the pocket PC) and I found that my p200 is at least 5 times faster. I have no pocket PC and the comparison was based on analysis that was posted here with the pocket PC. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.