Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: This would be a fair match with a very close score after 30 games.

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 12:33:28 10/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 07, 2001 at 14:41:15, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 07, 2001 at 14:21:30, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On October 07, 2001 at 10:30:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On October 07, 2001 at 10:19:37, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 07, 2001 at 08:10:15, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Also, you can't get anywhere by playing against the SAME program but at
>>>>>different speeds. The slower one will NEVER win, because the one on fast speed
>>>>>knows everything that the one on Palm knows, and at a fraction of the time.
>>>>>  But you MIGHT be a bit luckier if you played Palm Tiger vs. Deep Fritz, or
>>>>>Deep Junior.
>>>>>S.Taylor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>A fair match could only be accomplished by pairing Chess Tiger on a Palm III xe
>>>>16 MHz with 8 MB memory Versus Fritz 6e on a Pentium 90 MHz.  Now that could be
>>>>an interesting match. A match of 30 games at 20 Min per side.
>>>>
>>>>Pichard.
>>>
>>>palm tiger has no chance against p90
>>>
>>>I remember that the pocket PC is 10 times faster than the palm
>>>The pocket PC is slower than p90 so p90 is more than 10 times faster than the
>>>palm.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>You are right Uri a P90 is too powerful for a mere Palm III xe, in that case if
>>somebody has an old Pentium 200 MHz with Fritz 6e and match it against an iPaq
>>of 206 MHz with Chess Tiger 14.6, then we will have an even match.
>
>No
>
>Even here is is not a fair match and the MHZ is misleading.
>
>I compared the speed of my p200MMX(shredder5.32) with the speed of shredder on
>the pocket PC (pocket Fritz is the name of shredder on the pocket PC) and I
>found that my p200 is at least 5 times faster.
>
>I have no pocket PC and the comparison was based on analysis that was posted
>here with the pocket PC.
>
>Uri

Sorry Uri, but I'am like St. Thomas I would like to see somebody actually test
the iPaq H3670 against a P200MMX. Otherwise how can people claim that a mere
Palm III xe with only 16 MHz 8 MB memory can produce a 2200 Elo Using Chess
Tiger 14.6. Whereas the iPaq h3670 is almost 20 times faster, then we should be
able to reach at least a 2460 Elo. Sorry but I won't be convinced until I see
the actual test, of a least 30 games at 20 min per side.

Pichard.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.