Author: blass uri
Date: 00:29:16 05/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 1998 at 18:42:50, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On May 24, 1998 at 15:21:21, blass uri wrote: >>I do not have respect for IBM because deeper blue is not playing > >What would you do if you were a company and had to increase the profit >and getting a good name. Come on, this is capitalism and not socialism >or communism. >Any child could have told you before the match WHICH ideas IBM had. >They are only doing what any company would do, to increase the fame and >to maximize profit. I am capitalist and not communist but I am against lies I remember that after they lost the fifth game in the previous match against kasparov they said they rejected the draw kasparov suggested them because they saw the match as a scientific experiment. I did not like the fact that they said after the match that they are in the top when it was clear that they won only because of stupid mistakes of kasparov. IBM would have a better name from my point of view if deeper blue played after the match. I have more respect for someone who plays even if (s)he loses than for someone who is afraid of playing (like IBM and Fisher) > >>They are afraid to lose so they do not play against kasparov and >>they do not play against other top players. > >They can only loose, because no other player would play that weak as >kasparov has done it... I am not sure about it. I do not think kasparov played very weak but I expected him not to do stupid mistakes. he did 2 stupid mistakes in the games he lost(to resign in a draw position and to go to a variation you are not ready for it) and this is the difference between to lose and to win. but in the other games he played well (of course he did some mistakes in these games but everyone including world champions do mistakes). > >>Kasparov is not perfect but I do not hate him like you. > >Ha - i don't hate him. I feel for him. He is a small child and unable to >see the world from the view-point of an adult. > >Now , because he is seeing that iljumshinov can give him more money than >his own organisation could ever do, he turns his flag and suddenly likes >fide and fischer. >Pah - he has no money and wants to get something from the cake. >What an easy character. if kasparov wanted money he would play in the fide He could earn a lot of money if he played in the last fide championship (like karpov) he said he did not want to do it because it is dirty money. I am against iljumshinov because there are not enough games to decide if the world fide champion is deserved to the title. for me the world champion is kasparov and not the fide world champion kasparov is the best player in the world and he is not afraid to do a match against the best opponent that is possible. > >The sad thing is, you cannot make money with the name kasparov anymore. >He lost against deep blue, and nobody is interested in players like him. >He - who should behave like an idol and push chess in the world - has >damaged the reputation and the image of all chess players in the world. >With his appearances in the public, with his comments about Fischer, and >with his behaviour when he loses. you can make money with the name kasparov. kasparov will make money from his matches against the winner between kramnik and shirov. I am interested in another match between kasparov and deeper blue. Kasparov does not know to lose but everyone has weaknesses. > >This guy is not worth to be Fide-world-chess-champion, because he is >unable to fullfill the duties that grow out of this job. He is able to >take the money, but not to pay his fees. >And he wants the money... now ! I believe if someone is not a criminal and does not escape from winning in a fair serious match his(her) most serious opponents (s)he deserves to be a world-chess-champion
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.