Author: Werner Schuele
Date: 05:53:59 10/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2001 at 15:33:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 07, 2001 at 14:41:15, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 07, 2001 at 14:21:30, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On October 07, 2001 at 10:30:27, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On October 07, 2001 at 10:19:37, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 07, 2001 at 08:10:15, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Also, you can't get anywhere by playing against the SAME program but at >>>>>>different speeds. The slower one will NEVER win, because the one on fast speed >>>>>>knows everything that the one on Palm knows, and at a fraction of the time. >>>>>> But you MIGHT be a bit luckier if you played Palm Tiger vs. Deep Fritz, or >>>>>>Deep Junior. >>>>>>S.Taylor >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>A fair match could only be accomplished by pairing Chess Tiger on a Palm III xe >>>>>16 MHz with 8 MB memory Versus Fritz 6e on a Pentium 90 MHz. Now that could be >>>>>an interesting match. A match of 30 games at 20 Min per side. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard. >>>> >>>>palm tiger has no chance against p90 >>>> >>>>I remember that the pocket PC is 10 times faster than the palm >>>>The pocket PC is slower than p90 so p90 is more than 10 times faster than the >>>>palm. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>You are right Uri a P90 is too powerful for a mere Palm III xe, in that case if >>>somebody has an old Pentium 200 MHz with Fritz 6e and match it against an iPaq >>>of 206 MHz with Chess Tiger 14.6, then we will have an even match. >> >>No >> >>Even here is is not a fair match and the MHZ is misleading. >> >>I compared the speed of my p200MMX(shredder5.32) with the speed of shredder on >>the pocket PC (pocket Fritz is the name of shredder on the pocket PC) and I >>found that my p200 is at least 5 times faster. >> >>I have no pocket PC and the comparison was based on analysis that was posted >>here with the pocket PC. >> >>Uri > >Sorry Uri, but I'am like St. Thomas I would like to see somebody actually test >the iPaq H3670 against a P200MMX. Otherwise how can people claim that a mere >Palm III xe with only 16 MHz 8 MB memory can produce a 2200 Elo Using Chess >Tiger 14.6. Whereas the iPaq h3670 is almost 20 times faster, then we should be >able to reach at least a 2460 Elo. Sorry but I won't be convinced until I see >the actual test, of a least 30 games at 20 min per side. > >Pichard. Hi, I have tested the nps with Shredder5.32 and PocketFritz. On the Pentium you get the same speed, when you disable the 2nd level cache. Werner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.