Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:34:03 10/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2001 at 08:53:59, Werner Schuele wrote:
>On October 07, 2001 at 15:33:28, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On October 07, 2001 at 14:41:15, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On October 07, 2001 at 14:21:30, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 07, 2001 at 10:30:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On October 07, 2001 at 10:19:37, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On October 07, 2001 at 08:10:15, stuart taylor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Also, you can't get anywhere by playing against the SAME program but at
>>>>>>>different speeds. The slower one will NEVER win, because the one on fast speed
>>>>>>>knows everything that the one on Palm knows, and at a fraction of the time.
>>>>>>> But you MIGHT be a bit luckier if you played Palm Tiger vs. Deep Fritz, or
>>>>>>>Deep Junior.
>>>>>>>S.Taylor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>A fair match could only be accomplished by pairing Chess Tiger on a Palm III xe
>>>>>>16 MHz with 8 MB memory Versus Fritz 6e on a Pentium 90 MHz. Now that could be
>>>>>>an interesting match. A match of 30 games at 20 Min per side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pichard.
>>>>>
>>>>>palm tiger has no chance against p90
>>>>>
>>>>>I remember that the pocket PC is 10 times faster than the palm
>>>>>The pocket PC is slower than p90 so p90 is more than 10 times faster than the
>>>>>palm.
>>>>>
>>>>>Uri
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You are right Uri a P90 is too powerful for a mere Palm III xe, in that case if
>>>>somebody has an old Pentium 200 MHz with Fritz 6e and match it against an iPaq
>>>>of 206 MHz with Chess Tiger 14.6, then we will have an even match.
>>>
>>>No
>>>
>>>Even here is is not a fair match and the MHZ is misleading.
>>>
>>>I compared the speed of my p200MMX(shredder5.32) with the speed of shredder on
>>>the pocket PC (pocket Fritz is the name of shredder on the pocket PC) and I
>>>found that my p200 is at least 5 times faster.
>>>
>>>I have no pocket PC and the comparison was based on analysis that was posted
>>>here with the pocket PC.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>Sorry Uri, but I'am like St. Thomas I would like to see somebody actually test
>>the iPaq H3670 against a P200MMX. Otherwise how can people claim that a mere
>>Palm III xe with only 16 MHz 8 MB memory can produce a 2200 Elo Using Chess
>>Tiger 14.6. Whereas the iPaq h3670 is almost 20 times faster, then we should be
>>able to reach at least a 2460 Elo. Sorry but I won't be convinced until I see
>>the actual test, of a least 30 games at 20 min per side.
>>
>>Pichard.
>
>Hi,
>I have tested the nps with Shredder5.32 and PocketFritz. On the Pentium you get
>the same speed, when you disable the 2nd level cache.
>Werner
So, what's the speed ratio?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.