Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:25:37 10/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2001 at 13:38:52, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 08, 2001 at 13:28:53, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On October 07, 2001 at 19:02:32, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On October 07, 2001 at 16:17:06, Roy Eassa wrote: >>> >>>>Christophe, what's the highest TigerMark anybody has reliably reported to you >>>>(for Palm Tiger)? >>> >>> >>>I think it's something like 1.5. >>> >>>My m505 overclocked to 54MHz gives 1.35 but it is not the fastest. >>> >>> >>>>Also, how fast can the Visor Prism be reliably overclocked >>>>to? >>> >>> >>>I do not know exactly, but I remember that the Visors are the champions in term >>>of speed (and "overclockability"). >>> >>> >> >> >>OK, I'm getting 1.74 on my Prism, overclocked to 54MHz. That must be bogus, >>right? > > > >Download Chess Tiger from PalmGear (if you do not have it already): > > http://www.palmgear.com/software/showsoftware.cfm?prodID=16381 > >Check Chess Tiger's clock against a real stopwatch. If Chess Tiger counts the >time too slowly, decrease your Palm's overclocking and run Chess Tiger's "speed >test" (so it tries to adjust its clock). Run the test again until Chess Tiger >and your stopwatch agree. > > Tiger's clock is slow when I tell AfterBurner to "Adjust Ticks". If I do NOT choose that setting, Tiger's clock seems OK. This is the exact OPPOSITE result as I expected from that setting. Well, I guess that explains that. Now, with "Adjust Ticks" turned OFF, I get a TigerMark index of 1.25 with my Prism at 54 MHz, which is kind of disappointing. What were the circumstances under which you saw or heard about an index of 1.5?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.