Author: Slater Wold
Date: 17:00:29 10/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2001 at 19:53:02, K. Burcham wrote: > > >what is your point dan. to a gamer slates post is important. >his program found a mate in 1 second. did i read this right? >with some of these programs, if slate system was in a game, once the program >moves from this position it will see the shorter mate if it is there. >the point is, slates badass system sees a mate in one second. > >i also ran this through gambit tiger, shredder5, comet, SOS, and deep fritz. > i only posted SOS eval below. some of the others took lots of time. > one of the top programs takes 7 minutes on fast hardware in this position. > >kburcham I don't think Dann was hacking on me. I think he was simply saying, 2800mhz and 3:00 still couldn't find the shortest mate. Which is true. But I _will_ find the mate in 10. And I am guessing, in less than 20 minutes. Stay tuned............ Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.