Author: Tim Foden
Date: 14:35:33 10/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 2001 at 15:54:52, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 10, 2001 at 15:31:17, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On October 10, 2001 at 09:23:21, Tim Foden wrote: >> On my 920MHz Duron... >>> 16 7:56 +Mate10 388591k Rg3 2. Kc5 h3 3. Kc6 h2 4. Rd1 g1=Q 5. Rd5+ Ke4 6. >>> Rb5 Rxb5 7. Kxb5 Qc1 8. Kb4 Qc2 9. b8=Q Rb3+ 10. >>> Ka4 Qa2# >>> 17 9:12 -- 455126k Rg3 (a=320.98 b=321.00 e=320.98) >>> 17 12:39 ++ 625746k Rg3 (a=-321.00 b=320.98 e=320.98) >>> 17 12:49 0/28 Rg3 >exit >>> local: t=12:51 nps=823134.8 n=634776023 (28.9% / 71.1%) fh=94.3% >>> total: t=12:51 nps=823134.8 n=634776023 draws=786622 >>> trans: probes=157466652 hits=50262459 (31.92%) draft=39200352 (24.89%) >>> tcuts: exact=26821 (0.02%) upper=27122632 (17.22%) lower=4408899 (2.80%) >>> tstor: exact=21775 (0.03%) upper=66184235 (79.86%) lower=16671234 (20.12%) >>> ext: check=88835236 recap=173709 ppush=1582950 1rep=6413384 thrt=0 >>> q-moves: gen=15390981 tested=11156920 made/un=4609839 max-dep=9 >>> max eval diff: part-1=4.798 part-2=1.402 On your 950MHz Athlon... > 16 6:31 +Mate10 363016k Rg3 2. Kc5 h3 3. Kc6 h2 4. Rd1 g1=Q 5. Rd5+ Ke4 6. > Rb5 Rxb5 7. Kxb5 Qc1 8. Kb4 Qc2 9. b8=Q Rb3+ 10. > Ka4 Qa2# > 17 7:26 -- 419750k Rg3 (a=320.98 b=321.00 e=320.98) > 17 10:09 ++ 572042k Rg3 (a=-321.00 b=320.98 e=320.98) > local: t=16:39 nps=902743.0 n=901845641 (30.1% / 69.9%) fh=93.5% > total: t=16:39 nps=902743.0 n=901845641 draws=1129934 > trans: probes=234253343 hits=78907662 (33.68%) draft=61531618 (26.27%) > tcuts: exact=58849 (0.03%) upper=40671501 (17.36%) lower=6509021 (2.78%) > tstor: exact=38983 (0.03%) upper=91258254 (79.15%) lower=23998614 (20.81%) > ext: check=121469999 recap=315717 ppush=2515585 1rep=7944271 thrt=0 > q-moves: gen=43011618 tested=32110614 made/un=15682760 max-dep=9 > max eval diff: part-1=5.794 part-2=1.402 At 16 ply: 96MB Hash = 388591k Nodes, 192MB hash 363016k Nodes... So 192MB gives 6.6% fewer nodes than 96MB. The rest of this speedup (total speed up around 22%) is simply due to the faster MHz and larger caches of the Athlon. Cheers, Tim.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.