Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 12:49:11 05/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 1998 at 13:46:20, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Bravo ! I would advise you to continue to test Fritz against >weak programs on weak hardware. As you have told us, this stabilized its >elo. >Thats exactly what ChessBase needs. I am sure you have a reason for this >too. Thorsten: If your complaint has nothing to do with Fritz (but with the principle testing methods of the SSDF also in the past) - why do you use 'Fritz' and 'Chessbase' instead of naming all other programs, too? (just for a change) ... >I am sure this helps Fritz. And I am sure you will now come with the >point: I would assume the opposite ;-) >Why do you test anyway, if you know in forward that some programs don't >need a fast hardware, meanwhile other programs (Fritz) get it by >guaranty/agreement. OLD programs are rated on P90 and continue to play on that platform. NEW programs get P200MMX. Seems pretty consistent ... Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.