Author: Albert Silver
Date: 16:13:04 05/25/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 1998 at 16:02:58, Moritz Berger wrote: >On May 25, 1998 at 14:15:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I don't see any "proof"... Moritz followed up with games where the top >>programs had equal hardware as well... I dislike "handicap" matches, >>but >>it has *always* been done, with the idea of seeing how old/new programs >>and >>hardware perform... > >I'm just playing a 'handicap' tournament with Fritz against the rest of >the pack. Fritz gets my old Toshiba Tecra P133 notebook (about P120 >desktop equivalent, 80 MB RAM) and all the others get my P233MMX dual >HX430 desktop machine with 512KB sync. PB cache and 128MB RAM. What are the time controls? > >The Toshiba is about half as fast as the P233MMX (slightly slower, >depending on the program). > >Results so far (scores from Fritz' point of view): > >1. Genius 5 DOS 3/7 -1 >2. Rebel 9 DOS 7.5/15 +0 >3. M-Chess 6 DOS 0.5/1 +0 >4. Shredder 2 4/8 +0 >5. Hiarcs 6 4.5/8 +1 >6. CST Paris 4.5/8 +1 >7. M-Chess 7.1 8/14 +2 >8. Comet A82 4.5/6 +3 > >Fritz had white in all games except in >7 games against Rebel 9 >7 games against M-Chess 7.1 >1 game against Shredder 2 >1 game against Hiarcs 6 > >(I'm still completing games with Fritz/black, will post final standings >here) > >Fritz 5.01 was playing with PowerBook and 60MB hash tables, all other >programs got maximum hash tables possible on the 128MB P233MMX. > > >Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.