Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:46:44 10/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2001 at 13:42:02, Aaron Gordon wrote: >Hey Slate, here's an analysis by Gambit Tiger 2 (1.61GHz Tbird, 192mb hash, 12 >hours) of that same position.. > >[D]2rr1b2/8/ppkq1pP1/3pp3/2p5/2BPPpP1/BQ3P2/1RRN1n1K b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0: > >1...Kb7 2.Kg1 d4 3.exd4 exd4 4.Bxd4 Qxd4 5.Qxd4 Rxd4 6.Kxf1 Rxd3 7.Rxc4 Rxc4 > +- (3.70) Depth: 8 00:00:00 170kN >1...Kb7 2.Kg1 Nxg3 3.fxg3 e4 4.Kf2 exd3 5.Bxf6 Re8 6.Qd4 > +- (4.16) Depth: 9 00:00:00 334kN >1...Kb7 2.Kg1 > +- (4.16) Depth: 10 00:00:01 655kN >1...Kb7 2.Ba5 Rc6 3.Kg1 Qa3 4.g7 Bd6 5.Qxa3 Bxa3 6.Rc2 Ka7 7.Kxf1 bxa5 > +- (4.28) Depth: 11 00:00:06 2844kN >1...Kb7 2.Ba5 Rc6 3.Kg1 Nxg3 4.fxg3 e4 5.Qh2 exd3 6.Qf2 Bg7 7.Qxf3 Rg8 > +- (4.54) Depth: 12 00:00:14 6480kN >1...Kb7 2.Kg1 Nxg3 3.fxg3 e4 4.Be1 exd3 5.Qf2 Ka7 6.Qxf3 Bh6 7.Bb4 > +- (4.56) Depth: 13 00:00:44 20625kN >1...Kb7 2.Kg1 Nxg3 3.fxg3 e4 4.Be1 exd3 5.Qf2 Rc6 6.Qxf3 Qd7 7.g4 Ba3 8.Rc3 Bc5 > +- (4.32) Depth: 14 00:02:02 58420kN >1...Kb7 2.Ba5 Rc6 3.Kg1 Nxg3 4.fxg3 e4 5.Qf2 Qa3 6.Bxb6 Rxb6 7.dxe4 Rxb1 8.Rxb1+ >Ka7 9.exd5 c3 > +- (4.34) Depth: 15 00:06:28 189838kN >1...Kb7 2.Kg1 Nxg3 3.fxg3 e4 4.Qh2 cxd3 5.Bd4 Rxc1 6.Rxc1 Rd7 7.Rb1 b5 8.Nc3 Qc6 >9.Qh8 Bg7 > +- (4.56) Depth: 16 00:15:27 457597kN >1...Rb8 2.Kg1 Qd7 3.Kxf1 Qh3+ 4.Ke1 Qh1+ 5.Kd2 Qf1 6.Rc2 cxd3 7.Bxe5+ dxc2 >8.Qxc2+ Bc5 9.Qa4+ Kb7 > +- (3.56) Depth: 16 01:32:11 2634782kN >1...Rb8 2.Kg1 Qd7 3.Kxf1 Qh3+ 4.Ke1 Bc5 5.Bb4 Rh8 6.Kd2 Qf1 7.Rc3 Rh1 8.Qc2 Bxb4 >9.Rxb4 Qe2+ 10.Kc1 > +- (3.55) Depth: 17 02:11:45 3831543kN >1...b5 > +- (2.66) Depth: 17 07:13:12 13051933kN >1...b5 2.dxc4 Kb7 3.cxb5 a5 4.Kg1 Qe6 5.Kxf1 Qh3+ 6.Ke1 > +- (1.44) Depth: 17 10:17:35 18976631kN I am guessing that position is broken. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.