Author: Harald Faber
Date: 10:05:54 10/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2001 at 17:43:05, Marc van Hal wrote: >You have to play verry much games before givving a conclusion over this program Pardon? Count the games I have played and SEEN! >I don't agree on the point that Junior is bad in end games many times it is >simply better then Schredder in end games (If it can create an active endgame) 1) Shredder is definitely stronger than Junior in endgames 2) Shredder, in spite of that, is no "Endgame Whoudini" as Jeroen Noomen and/or some others say. Tiger is definitely stronger and wins more endgames. Of course anyone might disagree but that won't change my mind, I have seen ENOUGH games to say that. >That Schredder gives an other score then Junior is that by Schredder a pawn more >is a pawn more What are you talking about?? Shredder *5.32* evaluates much more positional than you might assume. >So the game you are talking about is a prophylaxis rather then standard May I ask HOW YOU know? >Something which is a rule is that Junior7 has a more risky search methode then >all other Comercial chess programs Definitely not. Let me name GambitTiger here. >Marc van Hal Harald Faber
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.