Author: Derrick Daniels
Date: 01:19:19 10/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2001 at 03:34:07, Chessfun wrote: >On October 19, 2001 at 03:04:48, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On October 19, 2001 at 02:54:48, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 19, 2001 at 01:44:19, Derrick Daniels wrote: >>> >>>>I thought this problem was fixed in the latest tiger version????? Come on chris >>>>get it together. >>> >>>Assuming your program is configured correctly Tiger hardly ever loses >>>on time, it is one of if not the best program at never losing on time. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>I do not agree. If - by way of exception - Tiger has reached bad positions, the >>program is thinking about each move rather long and often gets at the time limit >>when Tiger is forced to make the last moves within seconds. And it happenend >>twice that the flag fall. >>Kurt > >Kurt, these two games don't happen to be another of >your rated series as in; > >http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?193099 > >I have NEVER seen Tiger lose any game on time where it has to meet an >incremental time control, 40/40 or 5/1. At 1/0 sure it can lose on time >after 105 moves as can any program. > >Sarah. Sarah I don't understand why you find it so hard to believe that tiger can lose on time, have you forgotten the problems the previous tigers had? Talk to any tiger operator on ICC and I guarantee they will confirm the problem.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.