Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pocket ChessPartner 0.4 beta released

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 16:52:36 10/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 19, 2001 at 01:20:14, Lex Loep wrote:

>On October 18, 2001 at 18:08:33, Kevin Stafford wrote:
>
>>While this engine does seem to play chess well enough, what features will chess
>>partner bring to the pocket pc that we can't get with genius/fritz/eventually
>>tiger? I've already purchased genius and fritz (genius because it was cheap and
>>I could get it online, so I'd have a chess program for my new IPAQ, fritz
>>because of the added features..), and will probably get tiger because I like the
>>playing style, but why your program? I'm not trying to be overly harsh or
>>anything, but the pocket pc already has chess _playing_ programs covered pretty
>>well. What I'd like to see is a program with features the others don't have.
>>Especially if the engine isn't really that unique.
>
>Compared to the PC platform there are less than a handfull of programs for
>the PDA's. What I have seen so far is very basic so there is plenty of room
>for competition. As the current version is only at 0.4 beta much more can
>be expected.
>
>>
>>One of the main things I use my IPAQ for is so that I can study from chess books
>>without having to use a set. I export a set of games from chess assistant into
>>pgn, and move them onto my ipaq. I can then play through the games easily. It
>>would be a major selling point for me if your program somehow facilitated this
>>process better than the other programs. I don't have pocket fritz yet, but
>>genius doesn't allow me to enter variations, and this would be a very convenient
>>feature. Perhaps more database related features would be useful too. I guess I'm
>>simply asking what features do you plan on adding to your program that will make
>>someone like me want to purchase it?
>>
>
>Nothing is set in concrete but a few points of which the
>first is planned for the next beta.
>
>- Better PGN support (including variations)
>- Integration with it's bigger brother to make it easy to tranfer
>games etc.
>- Game play through Infrared.
>- Access to webservices like the Nalimov tablebase server.
>
>Of course I am open to suggestion.
>


Suggestion #1: Much stronger engine!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.