Author: Kevin Stafford
Date: 23:13:26 10/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2001 at 22:36:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 19, 2001 at 18:01:23, Kevin Stafford wrote: > >>>All stuff that's checked less well that's called Maxtor, the stuff >>>that's checked and passes test is sold under different brand name by >>>the same dudes. >> >>He asked what this other brand name is, and I'm curious as well. I have a >>feeling you are making this up completely because you don't like the company. If >>its true, post a link which references these 'tests' which you refer to. If this >>is indeed true, then maxtors drives must be exactly the same as another brands, >>with different labelling and with less quality control. Since I've never seen a >>brand that looks exactly like a maxtor, I'm sceptical. >> >>-Kevin > >You're very dumb then too. Because this product renaming is a well >known thing in the world. For example one company here in netherlands >called Uni-lever has like 20 different brands of food, washing machine powder >etcetera. > Ah, so instead of trying to back up your accusations you use the very intelligent method of debate known as 'namecalling'. I believe I studied that back in grade school. If I remember correctly, the proper response involves "I'm rubber and you're glue..", and to stick my tongue out at you. Be assured that even though you can't see me, I'm doing that right at this moment. So again, if you have any proof (key word here), besides hazy references to northern european food companies, I'd like to hear it. Simply saying that other companies (in entirely different professions mind you) do this really has no bearing on whether maxtor does or not. Its akin to me claiming that 'Diep is really just a modified crafty that you compiled'. I have no proof of this of course (nor do I really believe it), but other people have done that, so it must be true of you right? See the failing in logic there? Note that I'm not saying that you aren't correct, maxtors drives could be remarked throwbacks. I'm simply saying that I think you have no proof of this at all, and I'm calling your bluff. I welcome you to prove me wrong. -Kevin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.