Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:37:47 10/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2001 at 03:53:01, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 21, 2001 at 02:03:13, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 21, 2001 at 02:02:07, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> I finally got around to updating my website to >>>include a lightning rating list developed from a >>>ponder=off 1'/1"inc games, of 40 rounds all play all. >>>Others will be added as programs appear and added for >>>those missing. The current list contains 24 programs. >>> >>>With changing my pc's my current rating list of Sept >>>hasn't been changed....yet. Hopefully my next list will >>>include Gandalf_432h and Gandalf 5. >>> >>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999 >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Opps >>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999 >> >>It's late !! > > > >For those of you who wonder where the #@รง%*@ list is, just scroll down the >aforementionned page and click on "The best". > >Thanks Sarah for all the time you devote to these tests. > > > > Christophe The list suggests that Junior7 and Deep Fritz are not better than Junior6 and Fritz6 in 1 1 time control when the list for longer time control suggest that Junior7 and Deep Fritz are better than their previous versions. We have for serious games Deep fritz>Fritz6 2632-25>2576+19 Junior7>Junior6 2618-35>2559+20 At blitz we have the following rating: Junior6a 2600,Junior7 2574 Fritz6 2593,Deep Fritz 2576 It seems that there are changes that are productive at long time control and not productive at blitz(at least we have no proof that the new Junior and Fritz are better at 1 1 inspite of playing almost 1000 games and the rating of the old programs are better). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.