Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 11:02:07 10/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2001 at 13:12:38, Andrew Williams wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My program lost this game against a crafty clone on ICC recently:
>
>[Event "ICS rated blitz match"]
>[Site "204.178.125.65"]
>[Date "2001.10.21"]
>[Round "-"]
>[White "MoonShot"]
>[Black "PostModernist"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[WhiteElo "2859"]
>[BlackElo "2772"]
>[TimeControl "600+2"]
>
>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 e6 4. e4 Bb4 5. Bd3 d5 6. e5 dxc4 7. Bxc4 Nd5 8.
>Ne2 b6 9. O-O O-O 10. Qd3 Be7 11. Bd2 Bb7 12. Qg3 Kh8 13. Ne4 Ba6 14. Rac1
>Bxc4 15. Rxc4 Qd7 16. Bg5 Na6 17. Bxe7 Nxe7 18. Nd6 Nc7 19. Rfc1 Rad8 20.
>Qf3 Ne8 21. Ne4 Kg8 22. Qh3 a5 23. a4 Nc7 24. Qg4 Kh8 25. Qh5 Kg8 26. R1c3
>Qd5 27. Nf6+ gxf6 28. Rg3+ Kh8 29. Qh6 Ng6 30. Rh3
>{PostModernist resigns} 1-0
>
>
>The move 27.Nf6+ wins everything immediately. MoonShot (crafty 18.12
>on a K7 1.33GHz) found that in 14 seconds (albeit with hash-tables
>already full). With some fiddling about with null move rules, PM can
>find it in 37 seconds from a "standing start" (K7 1.2GHz). I'd be
>interested to know how other programs do on this.
>
>[D]3r1rk1/2n1nppp/1pp1p3/p2qP2Q/P1RPN3/2R5/1P2NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Nf6
An experimental version of Gaviota sees it in 24 seconds on a pIII 800mhz
(depth=8).
A current version of Gaviota sees it in 84 seconds an depth=10 but the
score is not that high.
setboard 3r1rk1/2n1nppp/1pp1p3/p2qP2Q/P1RPN3/2R5/1P2NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Nf6
d
+-----------------+
| . . . r . r k . |
| . . n . n x x x |
| . x x . x . . . |
| x . . q o . . Q |
| o . R o N . . . |
| . . R . . . . . |
| . o . . N o o o |
| . . . . . . K . |
+-----------------+
analyze
1518 1: 0.0 +1.15 Ne4-g5 h7-h6
3238 2: 0.0 +1.15 Ne4-g5 h7-h6 <EMPTY> <-transp
7924 3 0.1 :-(
11705 3: 0.1 +0.38 Qh5-g4 Nc7-e8 b2-b4 Qd5-d7
b4xa5 b6xa5
13980 4 0.1 :-) Qh5-g4
16043 4 0.2 +0.95 Qh5-g4 Nc7-e8 Ne4-f6 Ne8xf6
e5xf6 Ne7-f5 f6xg7
23073 4: 0.2 +0.95 Qh5-g4 Nc7-e8 Ne4-f6 Ne8xf6
e5xf6 Ne7-f5 f6xg7
40921 5 0.4 +0.98 Qh5-g4 Kg8-h8 Ne4-d6 c6-c5
d4xc5 Qd5xe5 <-transp
156491 5: 1.4 +0.98 Qh5-g4 Kg8-h8 Ne4-d6 c6-c5
d4xc5 Qd5xe5 <-transp
225090 6 2.1 :-( Qh5-g4
459071 6 4.1 :-(
515181 6 4.5 +0.50 Qh5-g4 Qd5xe5 Ne2-g3 f7-f5
Qg4-g5 Rd8xd4 Rc4xd4 Qe5xd4
Qg5xe7 f5xe4 <-transp
589761 6: 5.0 +0.50 Qh5-g4 Qd5xe5 Ne2-g3 f7-f5
Qg4-g5 Rd8xd4 Rc4xd4 Qe5xd4
Qg5xe7 f5xe4 <-transp
656615 7 5.6 +0.50 Qh5-g4 Qd5xe5 Ne2-g3 f7-f5
Qg4-g5 Rd8xd4 Rc4xd4 Qe5xd4
<-transp
1507577 7: 13.0 +0.50 Qh5-g4 Qd5xe5 Ne2-g3 f7-f5
Qg4-g5 Rd8xd4 Rc4xd4 Qe5xd4
<-transp
1739172 8 15.2 +0.50 Qh5-g4 Qd5xe5 Ne2-g3 f7-f5
Qg4-g5 Rd8xd4 Rc4xd4 Qe5xd4
Qg5xe7 f5xe4 <-transp
2714992 8 24.3 :-) Ne4-f6
2752469 8 24.7 :-) Ne4-f6
2820938 8 25.3 :-) Ne4-f6
4052228 8 36.6 +9.12 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8
Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4
Rh3xh4 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Rf8-g8
Ne2-g3 Rg8-g7 Rc4xc6
4340572 8: 39.0 +9.12 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8
Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4
Rh3xh4 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Rf8-g8
Ne2-g3 Rg8-g7 Rc4xc6
5346760 9 48.3 +9.12 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 <-transp
6123771 9: 54.8 +9.12 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 <-transp
8643434 10 77.2 +9.20 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8
Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4
Rh3xh4 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Rf8-g8
Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 Rc4xc6 Nc7-d5
e5xf6
11541072 10: 101.2 +9.20 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8
Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4
Rh3xh4 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Rf8-g8
Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 Rc4xc6 Nc7-d5
e5xf6
13562550 11 119.8 :-) Ne4-f6
16737135 11 147.8 :-) Ne4-f6
26478518 11 234.9 +11.13 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8
Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4
Rh3xh4 Qd5-e4 Qh6xf6 Kh8-g8
Rh4xe4 h7-h5 Rc4xc6 Nc7-d5
>
>
>Regards
>
>Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.