Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:20:33 10/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2001 at 10:16:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On October 23, 2001 at 13:12:38, Andrew Williams wrote:
>
>hi here diep dual 1.2, under 500000 nodes to find Nxf6.
Node count is not very interesting. _time_ is the interesting
bit of data. I found this in under 2 seconds on my quad and posted
the results yesterday.
In a game, we get a time bound to make a move, not a total nodes bound...
>
>00:00 0 0 3 (0) 1 0.278 Ne4-d6
>00:00 0 0 765 (0) 2 -3.860 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6
>++ e4-g5
>00:00 0 0 871 (0) 2 -0.353 Ne4-g5 h7-h6
>00:00 0 0 1230 (0) 3 -0.495 Ne4-g5 h7-h6 Ng5-f3
>++ e4-g3
>00:00 0 0 1693 (0) 3 -0.388 Ne4-g3 f7-f6 f2-f4
>++ e4-d2
>00:00 0 0 2055 (96) 3 -0.352 Ne4-d2 f7-f6 Rc3-h3
>00:00 0 0 5254 (122) 4 -0.570 Ne4-d2 Qd5-d7 Rc3-h3 h7-h6
>++ e4-g3
>00:00 0 0 6334 (288) 4 -0.528 Ne4-g3 f7-f6 b2-b3 Qd5-d7
>++ e4-d6
>00:00 0 0 11563 (792) 4 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Qc4
>xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
>00:00 0 0 18596 (792) 5 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Qc4
>xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
>00:00 0 0 43119 (1306) 6 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Qc
>4xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
>00:01 0 0 111417 (8331) 7 0.679 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 Rf8-e8 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xc7 Q
>c4xa4 Qh5xh7 Kg8-f8
>00:02 0 0 296357 (37301) 8 0.073 Ne4-d6 Rd8xd6 Rc3-h3 h7-h6 e5xd6 Qd5xc4 d6xe7 R
>f8-e8 Qh5xa5
>++ e4-f6
>00:04 0 0 488650 (47559) 8 4.230 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh5xh4
> Rf8-e8 Qh4xh7 Kg8-f8 e5xf6
>00:05 0 0 546706 (64166) 9 4.230 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh5xh4
> Rf8-e8 Qh4xh7 Kg8-f8 e5xf6
>00:06 0 0 761974 (86333) 10 12.837 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh5x
>h4 Qd5-e4 Qh4xe4 f6-f5 Rh3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qe4-h4
>00:09 0 0 1131355 (144422) 11 12.837 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg
>3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6
>00:21 0 0 2684390 (453893) 12 15.970 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Ne7-g6 Rg3-h3 Ng6-h4 Qh
>5xh4 Qd5-e4 Qh4xe4 f6-f5 Qe4-h4 Rf8-e8 Qh4xh7 Kg8-f8 Qh7-h6 Kf8-e7 Rc4xc6
>00:33 0 0 4832334 (580006) 13 19.073 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 Rg
>3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 f6xg7 Rg8xg7
>Rc4xc6
>01:05 0 0 9212310 (1210555) 14 19.957 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6 R
>g3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 Rc4xc6 Nc7-e
>8 f6xg7 Rg8xg7 Rc6xb6
>02:19 0 0 19270120 (2593426) 15 19.957 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6
>Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 Rc4xc6 Nc7-
>e8 f6xg7 Rg8xg7 Rc6xb6
>07:19 0 0 56596996 (11538884) 16 22.608 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g6
> Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f1 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 f6xg7 Rg8x
>g7 Rc4xc6 b6-b5
>16:31 0 0 126213046 (19865894) 17 24.790 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g
>6 Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-h4 Kg2-h1 Rf8-g8 Qh6xh4 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 Rc4xc6 Rg
>7-g2
>40:20 0 0 305867223 (41386476) 18 28.206 Ne4-f6 g7xf6 Rc3-g3 Kg8-h8 Qh5-h6 Ne7-g
>6 Rg3-h3 Qd5xg2 Kg1xg2 Ng6-f4 Ne2xf4 Rf8-g8 Kg2-f3 Rg8-g7 e5xf6 Rd8-g8 f6xg7 Rg8
>xg7 Nf4-h5 Nc7-e8 Nh5xg7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>My program lost this game against a crafty clone on ICC recently:
>>
>>[Event "ICS rated blitz match"]
>>[Site "204.178.125.65"]
>>[Date "2001.10.21"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "MoonShot"]
>>[Black "PostModernist"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[WhiteElo "2859"]
>>[BlackElo "2772"]
>>[TimeControl "600+2"]
>>
>>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 e6 4. e4 Bb4 5. Bd3 d5 6. e5 dxc4 7. Bxc4 Nd5 8.
>>Ne2 b6 9. O-O O-O 10. Qd3 Be7 11. Bd2 Bb7 12. Qg3 Kh8 13. Ne4 Ba6 14. Rac1
>>Bxc4 15. Rxc4 Qd7 16. Bg5 Na6 17. Bxe7 Nxe7 18. Nd6 Nc7 19. Rfc1 Rad8 20.
>>Qf3 Ne8 21. Ne4 Kg8 22. Qh3 a5 23. a4 Nc7 24. Qg4 Kh8 25. Qh5 Kg8 26. R1c3
>>Qd5 27. Nf6+ gxf6 28. Rg3+ Kh8 29. Qh6 Ng6 30. Rh3
>>{PostModernist resigns} 1-0
>>
>>
>>The move 27.Nf6+ wins everything immediately. MoonShot (crafty 18.12
>>on a K7 1.33GHz) found that in 14 seconds (albeit with hash-tables
>>already full). With some fiddling about with null move rules, PM can
>>find it in 37 seconds from a "standing start" (K7 1.2GHz). I'd be
>>interested to know how other programs do on this.
>>
>>[D]3r1rk1/2n1nppp/1pp1p3/p2qP2Q/P1RPN3/2R5/1P2NPPP/6K1 w - - bm Nf6
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.