Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: A random thought about bitboards

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 20:13:13 10/24/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 24, 2001 at 17:16:06, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On October 24, 2001 at 15:23:35, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>"numbers" simply don't require such large representations, which wastes a lot
>>of bus bandwidth transferring 128 bit values when the majority are 16 bits or
>>less...
>
>The only bus bandwidth that's really wasted is in the datapath, which doesn't
>really matter. Just because the datapath is 128 bits doesn't mean all memory
>transactions have to be.
>
>-Tom


Sure it does.  In fact, the memory datapath is _always_ a multiple of the
wordsize, otherwise super-scalar won't work at all.

IE Intel uses 64 bit data paths.  Alphas use 256.  Cray does it totally
different but they gate pairs of words (128 bits) to/from memory...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.