Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 13:59:13 10/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2001 at 16:53:33, James T. Walker wrote: >Hello Jeroen, >Thanks for the info. This begs the question as to why Deep Shredder was not >tested then. Maybe it was because of some hidden politics? Was it because >Millenium did not allow it? Probably a combination of Millennium not wanting to see Shredder tested and animosity from the side of SSDF. The switch to Chessbase has removed this obstacle. >If so, that's too bad because I think Deep Shredder >was an improvement over Shredder 5. That would have possibly put Deep Shredder >close to the top. I'm of the same opinion. It's not unreasonable to assume that Shredder 5.32 is a hybrid of Shredder 5 and Deep Shredder. According to SMK (IIRC) Shredder 5.32 isn't just a port of Shredder 5. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.